You noticed something in your child worth understanding better — and this is what their answers, and yours, came back with. Before you read on, take a breath: nothing in here is a diagnosis, and nothing here says something is wrong with your child.

What you're holding is a structured summary of two points of view — yours and your child's — organised so a professional (a paediatrician, psychologist, or neuropsychologist) can read it quickly and pick up the conversation from somewhere real, instead of from a blank page. Parts may read as clinical or blunt. That tone is for them, not a verdict on your child.

The numbers are not marks against a norm. Each area shows how strongly the answers leaned toward a trait — nothing more. A high number doesn't mean something is broken; it means that area was recognised often. There is no pass or fail, and no percentile against other children.

Not every section will apply. Some panels appear only when the profile activates them. If something you'd expect isn't there, that part simply wasn't relevant.

It states its own limits. This tool isn't validated, can't tell a passing mood from a lasting trait, and can't diagnose. That honesty is what makes the rest worth showing to a professional.

From here on, you're reading over a clinician's shoulder. You don't need to understand every line — that's their job. You only need to bring it.